Consumer Reports Archives Exhibitions

This Sneeze Was for Science

Highspeed black and white photograph of a man sneezing, water droplits backlite against a dark background.

Antihistamine, 1950

Two women, their backs are painted with grids displaying the results of various sunburn preventatives.

Sunsburn Preventives, 1940

A pile of burnt toasted next to a line of toasters as a Conusmer Rerports tester in a white lab coat inserts fresh slices of bread into a toaster.

Toasters, 1958

A 1970 Datsun navigating a slalom course on a Consumer Reports test track, demonstrating the car’s handling and agility during performance evaluation.

Datsun 710, 1974

A television engulfed in flames. A mound of burned toast piled next to a procession of toasters. A backlit spray of droplets from a simulated sneeze. All of these visual compositions can make communicating various testing procedures, and their results, increasingly more accessible. For ninety years, Consumer Reports has used photography to connect with its readers by providing visual context to the organization’s numerous testing methods and findings. Photographs also served to helped reinforce the authority and credibility of Consumer Reports by providing visual proof that their innovative testing techniques were legitimate, effective, and comprehensive.

When photography first emerged in the early nineteenth century, it was initially heralded as a science, a method of replicating reality to near perfection though the means of advancements in chemistry, engineering, and the harnessing of light. The camera, referred to as the “Mechanical Eye,” was seen as an objective tool used to capture its subjects free of human influence. Today, however, we understand that every image is influenced by its creator to some degree. Through factors such as choice in composition, framing, cropping, or even digital alterations, photography can indeed be a fallible witness to reality.

The photographs in this exhibition invite you to explore the complexities and the hurdles faced by a science-based, activist organization like Consumer Reports, when using a fallible medium like photography in their pursuit to communicate truth. As you view these unique behind-the-scenes images of the early years of the organization’s testing process, and the individuals who helped shape it, consider not only what each photograph depicts, but what it means to seek truth from photography.

A special thanks to the countless photographers at Consumer Reports for decades of insightful documentation. Their images brought the organization’s testing to life and helped build trust between the non-profit and the consumers they served.

This exhibit was curated by Steven Kramer, Consumer Reports Exhibit Assistant & Digitization Coordinator

A man pushing a lawnmower is outlined with white paint and is masked with a layer of red Rubylith.
Side view of a 1970 Citroën DS, outlined with white paint masked with a red Rubyith overlay.
A man wearing ear protection while using a chainsaw to cut a large branch off a stump. He is outlined with white paint and masked with a red Rubylith overlay.

Seeing Red!

Red masking film, commonly known by the trademarked name Rubylith, was a cornerstone of traditional graphic arts and photographic processes before the advent of digital image editing software like Photoshop. First introduced in 1961 by the Ulano Corporation, Rubylith became so widely recognized that its name is often used generically to describe any red masking film.

Structurally, Rubylith consists of two layers: a clear polyester base and a thin, translucent red coating. When placed over a photograph, artists or technicians would carefully trace the desired subject using precision tools such as scalpels or X-Acto knives, cutting only through the red layer. Once the tracing was complete, the red film was removed from the undesired areas, leaving only the clear polyester layers behind. The red film that remained attached, masked the portions of the image the photographer or designer wished to be retained. Unmasked areas (areas only covered by the clear polyester layer) would be eliminated in the reproduction process. This technique allowed graphic artists to isolate subjects from their backgrounds, enabling the creation of dynamic and innovative layouts for print publications.

Though now considered labor-intensive and manual, the Rubylith process laid the groundwork for the precision we associate with modern digital design. Today, digital “masking” tools in software like Adobe Photoshop carry forward the legacy of this analog technique.

Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info